News Release

For Immediate Release 
Contact: Marc Ramsey 202-686-7463
mramsey@sio.org


SIO ANNOUNCES 2006 TIGER TRUST INDUCTEES,
WINNERS OF AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN SURETY BOND PROMOTION

MAY 14, 2007, WASHINGTON, DC – The Surety Information Office (SIO) has named the recipients of the 2006 Awards for Excellence in Surety Bond Promotion and the newest members of the Tiger Trust. The SIO Awards for Excellence in Surety Bond Promotion are presented annually by SIO to local surety associations that actively promote the benefits of surety bonds.

Silver Award

The Silver Award for Excellence in Surety Bond Promotion recognizes local surety associations that conducted at least five promotional activities in 2006. Three LSAs have won the Silver Award:

Gold Award

The Gold Award for Excellence in Surety Bond Promotion recognizes local surety associations that conducted 10 or more promotional activities in 2006. Eleven LSAs have won the Gold Award:

Platinum Award

Only 11 Platinum Awards for Excellence in Surety Bond Promotion have been given since 1998. This award recognizes individual NASBP and SFAA members who have undertaken special initiatives to promote contract surety bonds. This award is not based simply on the volume of activities, but takes into account the impact of the member’s actions in promoting the value and benefits of contract surety bonds. Four individuals have won this award:

2006 Tiger Trust Inductees

Two individuals and an agency were inducted into SIO’s prestigious Tiger Trust for persuading private construction owners to require bonds on $66 million in projects in 2006:

David R. Bradbury

David R. Bradbury, Murray Insurance Associates Inc., Lancaster, PA, convinced Franklin & Marshall College, not once but twice, under severe time and scheduling constraints, to require its contractor to specify subcontractor bonds for the $45 million Life Sciences Building.

The original contractor was heavily promoting subcontractor default insurance, but Bradbury persuaded the college to require performance and payment bonds instead. Then the college and its contractor parted ways and the second contractor also advocated subcontractor default insurance. Once again, Bradbury reiterated the shortcomings of default insurance relative to surety bonds. The college, despite extreme pressure from the contractor, wisely listened to Bradbury and required subcontractor bonds. Thanks to him, 16 subcontract bonds were written.

“On behalf of Franklin & Marshall College, I would like to thank you for the time and effort you committed to educate our staff on the value of utilizing surety bonds in our construction project,” said Barry Bosley, Associate VP for Administration, Franklin & Marshall College. “In addition, your insight detailing the differences between [subcontractor default insurance] and the surety bond product was influential in our decision making process.”

Gibson Insurance Group

A group effort by J. Kevin Hughes and Thomas McGovern of Gibson Insurance Group, South Bend, IN, convinced Madison Center to bond two of its projects - a $16 million mental health facility and a $3.3 million child day care center. The bonds generated $110,000 in premium.

“On behalf of Madison Center I would like to thank Gibson Insurance Group for stressing the importance of requiring performance and payment bonds for our new facilities,” said Andrew Poole, Chief Financial Officer, Madison Center Inc. “Your influence and advice helped persuade Madison Center to require surety bonds for these two high profile projects.”

Jason Gusso

Jason Gusso, Gusso Surety Bonds Inc., Sioux Falls, SD, persuaded Home Federal Bank to require a surety bond on its $1.7 million branch building because, while its general contractor had an excellent reputation, a surety bond provided the “umbrella” protection the bank needed.

“Jason emphatically stated that protecting our project with a contract surety bond was an excellent idea and an outstanding risk management tool,” said Steve Johnson, Facilities Manager, Home Federal Bank. “I appreciate Jason taking the time to explain the benefits of bonding and the practical application of using surety on our project.”

Bradbury, the Gibson Insurance Group, and Gusso were inducted into the Tiger Trust at the National Association of Surety Bond Producers’ annual meeting April 25, 2007, in Phoenix, AZ, and were recognized at The Surety & Fidelity Association of America’s annual meeting May 10, 2007, in Washington, DC.

- 30 -

SIO was formed in 1993 to disseminate information about the benefits of contract surety bonding in private and public construction. Located in Washington, DC, SIO is supported by the National Association of Surety Bond Producers (NASBP) [surety agents and brokers] and The Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA) [surety companies]. Surety bonding is a careful, rigorous, and professional process in which sureties prequalify contractors and assure project owners that these contractors are capable of performing the contract and will pay certain subcontractors and suppliers associated with the project.